
Experience Everything Compliance Network Has to Offer
An Environmental Management System is a framework that assists an organization in achieving its environmental goals through regular review, evaluation, and advancement of its environmental performance. The presumption is that this regular review and evaluation will pinpoint opportunities for improving and executing the environmental performance of the organization. Each organization's Environmental Management System is customized to its own particular objectives and targets.
An Environmental Management System (EMS) encourages an organization to constantly improve environmental performance. The system follows a cycle that repeats. The organization starts by committing to an environmental policy. Then the organization uses its policy as a foundation for developing a plan, which sets various goals for improving environmental performance. The next step in the process is implementation. Then, the organization evaluates its environmental performance to better understand whether the goals are being met. If goals are not being met, action is taken. The outcome of this evaluation is then analyzed by top management to see if the EMS is working. Management returns to the environmental policy and sets new targets in an amended plan. The company then puts the revised plan into action. The cycle repeats, and ongoing improvement happens.
An Environmental Management System (EMS) is a framework that assists an organization in achieving its environmental goals through regular review, evaluation, and advancement of its environmental performance. The presumption is that this regular review and evaluation will pinpoint opportunities for improving and executing the environmental performance of the organization. The EMS itself does not dictate a level of environmental performance that needs to be attained; each organization's EMS is customized to its own particular objectives and targets.
Basic EMS
An EMS helps an organization tackle its regulatory demands in a structured and cost-effective way. This approach can help lower the risk of non-compliance and improve health and safety practices for employees and the community. An EMS can also help tackle non-regulated issues, such as energy conservation. It can encourage greater operational control and employee stewardship. Fundamental elements of an EMS include the following:
The most used framework for an Environmental Management System (EMS) is the one developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) for the ISO 14001 standard. It was created in 1996. The ISO framework is the official international standard for an EMS.
The ISO 14001 standard can apply to any organization, no matter the size or type. It does not outline defined environmental performance criteria, rather it targets the environmental aspects of company activities, goods, and services that an organization determines it can alter or control using a life cycle perspective.
The standard is versatile and does not require organizations to automatically "retool" their already existing activities. The standard sets a management framework by which an organization's environmental impacts can be systematically recognized and lessened. For example, many organizations, including various counties and municipalities, have functional and constructive pollution prevention activities underway. These could be integrated into the overall EMS under ISO 14001:2015.
Potential benefits of implementing an Environmental Management System (EMS) include the following:
The following are the 10 main elements of an Environmental Management System (EMS):
An important part of an Environmental Management System (EMS) is to set goals and create an action plan that will allow your business to achieve ongoing improvement in environmental performance. Every goal should have a timeline, be specific, and be measurable to drive change and track achievements, improvements, and reductions.
The following are tips related to developing goals:
This is an example of environmental performance goals:
Goal | Related environmental aspect | Performance indicator |
Reduce plastic waste by 40 percent over the first 3 years of EMS | Solid waste | Per 500 units manufactured |
Reduce energy use by 15 percent in the first 5 years of EMS | Energy use | Kilowatts per 500 units manufactured |
Reduce water use by 8 percent over the first two years of EMS | Water use | Gallons of water per 500 units manufactured |
All Environmental Management System (EMS) responsibilities should be assigned to a certain individual. Assign someone for:
To start, some businesses find it helpful to designate an EMS management representative, an EMS coordinator, and an EMS team with members from each process area, and then to define the responsibilities of these individuals. As the EMS progresses, responsibilities should be assigned for all EMS-related tasks as they are added. An employee must be competent enough to carry out their assigned responsibilities. An employee also must receive proper training to do EMS-related tasks. This doesn’t have to be a structured training class. A quick chat once a week between a manager and a front-line person on their EMS duties may be more effective than a formal EMS training class. Managers must ensure that any employee assigned an EMS task has enough authority and resources—including time—to carry out the task.
The dynamics of the business will determine who should be responsible for implementing the EMS. Key concepts concerning the assignment of responsibility include:
Keep the following points in mind while planning an Environmental Management System (EMS):
Who does the reviews and why?
A team of two or three managers or employees can conduct an internal assessment. They should not conduct the assessment of their own work area to prevent bias. The results should be organized into a clear format and presented to the owner or president of the company. Evaluating the EMS on a regular basis enables a company to determine what parts of the Environmental Management System (EMS) work well and what needs tweaks. Results should show progress toward goals.
How are EMS evaluations done?
The whole audit process revolves around planning, executing, and reporting. An audit of any kind is the comparison of actual conditions to expected conditions. It is a determination as to whether one is in conformance or not. As a company, conduct annual internal assessments and management briefings. Those doing the assessments should include employee interviews, observations, and documentation.
In the EMS report consider including the following helpful measures of progress:
How society uses materials is fundamental to our economic and environmental future. Global competition for finite resources will intensify as world population and economies grow. More productive and less impactful use of materials helps society remain economically competitive, contributes to prosperity, and protects the environment in a resource constrained future.
Both U.S. and global consumption of materials has been increasing rapidly. People have consumed more resources in the last 50 years than all previous history. And of all the materials consumed in the U.S. over the last 100 years, more than half were consumed in the last 25 years. This increasing consumption has come at a cost to the environment, including habitat destruction, biodiversity loss, overly stressed fisheries, and desertification. Material consumption is also associated with an estimated 42 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Failure to find more productive and sustainable ways to extract, use, and manage materials, and change the relationship between material consumption and growth, has grave implications for our economy and society.
By looking at a product’s entire lifecycle, humans can find new opportunities to reduce environmental impacts, conserve resources, and reduce costs. For example, a product is re-designed so, it is manufactured using different, fewer, less toxic and more durable materials. It is designed so that at the end of its useful life it can be readily disassembled. The manufacturer maintains a relationship with the customer to ensure best use of the product, its maintenance and return at end-of-life. This helps the manufacturer identify changing needs of their customers, create customer loyalty, and reduce material supply risk. Further, the manufacturer has a similar relationship with its supply chain, which helps the manufacturer respond more quickly to changing demands, including reducing supply chain environmental impacts.
Materials have environmental impacts throughout their lifecycles. The major stages in a material’s lifecycle is raw material acquisition, materials manufacture, production, use/ reuse/maintenance, movement or transport of materials, and waste management.
Applying a life cycle perspective can help identify opportunities and lead to sustainable solutions that help improve environmental performance, societal image, and economic benefits. Businesses do not always consider their supply chains or the use and end-of-life processes associated with their products. Government actions often focus on a specific country or region, and not on the impacts or benefits that can occur in other regions or that are attributable to their own levels of consumption. Currently, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is researching lifecycle perspectives in the following areas of application:
The most used framework for an Environmental Management System (EMS) is the one developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) for the ISO 14001 standard. It was created in 1996. The ISO framework is the official international standard for an EMS.
The ISO 14001 standard can apply to any organization, no matter the size or type. It does not outline defined environmental performance criteria, rather it targets the environmental aspects of company activities, goods, and services that an organization determines it can alter or control using a life cycle perspective.
The standard is versatile and does not require organizations to automatically "retool" their already existing activities. The standard sets a management framework by which an organization's environmental impacts can be systematically recognized and lessened. For example, many organizations, including various counties and municipalities, have functional and constructive pollution prevention activities underway. These could be integrated into the overall EMS under ISO 14001:2015.
Potential benefits of implementing an Environmental Management System (EMS) include the following:
The following are the 10 main elements of an Environmental Management System (EMS):
An important part of an Environmental Management System (EMS) is to set goals and create an action plan that will allow your business to achieve ongoing improvement in environmental performance. Every goal should have a timeline, be specific, and be measurable to drive change and track achievements, improvements, and reductions.
The following are tips related to developing goals:
This is an example of environmental performance goals:
Goal | Related environmental aspect | Performance indicator |
Reduce plastic waste by 40 percent over the first 3 years of EMS | Solid waste | Per 500 units manufactured |
Reduce energy use by 15 percent in the first 5 years of EMS | Energy use | Kilowatts per 500 units manufactured |
Reduce water use by 8 percent over the first two years of EMS | Water use | Gallons of water per 500 units manufactured |
All Environmental Management System (EMS) responsibilities should be assigned to a certain individual. Assign someone for:
To start, some businesses find it helpful to designate an EMS management representative, an EMS coordinator, and an EMS team with members from each process area, and then to define the responsibilities of these individuals. As the EMS progresses, responsibilities should be assigned for all EMS-related tasks as they are added. An employee must be competent enough to carry out their assigned responsibilities. An employee also must receive proper training to do EMS-related tasks. This doesn’t have to be a structured training class. A quick chat once a week between a manager and a front-line person on their EMS duties may be more effective than a formal EMS training class. Managers must ensure that any employee assigned an EMS task has enough authority and resources—including time—to carry out the task.
The dynamics of the business will determine who should be responsible for implementing the EMS. Key concepts concerning the assignment of responsibility include:
Keep the following points in mind while planning an Environmental Management System (EMS):
Who does the reviews and why?
A team of two or three managers or employees can conduct an internal assessment. They should not conduct the assessment of their own work area to prevent bias. The results should be organized into a clear format and presented to the owner or president of the company. Evaluating the EMS on a regular basis enables a company to determine what parts of the Environmental Management System (EMS) work well and what needs tweaks. Results should show progress toward goals.
How are EMS evaluations done?
The whole audit process revolves around planning, executing, and reporting. An audit of any kind is the comparison of actual conditions to expected conditions. It is a determination as to whether one is in conformance or not. As a company, conduct annual internal assessments and management briefings. Those doing the assessments should include employee interviews, observations, and documentation.
In the EMS report consider including the following helpful measures of progress:
How society uses materials is fundamental to our economic and environmental future. Global competition for finite resources will intensify as world population and economies grow. More productive and less impactful use of materials helps society remain economically competitive, contributes to prosperity, and protects the environment in a resource constrained future.
Both U.S. and global consumption of materials has been increasing rapidly. People have consumed more resources in the last 50 years than all previous history. And of all the materials consumed in the U.S. over the last 100 years, more than half were consumed in the last 25 years. This increasing consumption has come at a cost to the environment, including habitat destruction, biodiversity loss, overly stressed fisheries, and desertification. Material consumption is also associated with an estimated 42 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Failure to find more productive and sustainable ways to extract, use, and manage materials, and change the relationship between material consumption and growth, has grave implications for our economy and society.
By looking at a product’s entire lifecycle, humans can find new opportunities to reduce environmental impacts, conserve resources, and reduce costs. For example, a product is re-designed so, it is manufactured using different, fewer, less toxic and more durable materials. It is designed so that at the end of its useful life it can be readily disassembled. The manufacturer maintains a relationship with the customer to ensure best use of the product, its maintenance and return at end-of-life. This helps the manufacturer identify changing needs of their customers, create customer loyalty, and reduce material supply risk. Further, the manufacturer has a similar relationship with its supply chain, which helps the manufacturer respond more quickly to changing demands, including reducing supply chain environmental impacts.
Materials have environmental impacts throughout their lifecycles. The major stages in a material’s lifecycle is raw material acquisition, materials manufacture, production, use/ reuse/maintenance, movement or transport of materials, and waste management.
Applying a life cycle perspective can help identify opportunities and lead to sustainable solutions that help improve environmental performance, societal image, and economic benefits. Businesses do not always consider their supply chains or the use and end-of-life processes associated with their products. Government actions often focus on a specific country or region, and not on the impacts or benefits that can occur in other regions or that are attributable to their own levels of consumption. Currently, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is researching lifecycle perspectives in the following areas of application:
An important part of an Environmental Management System (EMS) is to set goals and create an action plan that will allow your business to achieve ongoing improvement in environmental performance. Every goal should have a timeline, be specific, and be measurable to drive change and track achievements, improvements, and reductions.
The following are tips related to developing goals:
This is an example of environmental performance goals:
Goal | Related environmental aspect | Performance indicator |
Reduce plastic waste by 40 percent over the first 3 years of EMS | Solid waste | Per 500 units manufactured |
Reduce energy use by 15 percent in the first 5 years of EMS | Energy use | Kilowatts per 500 units manufactured |
Reduce water use by 8 percent over the first two years of EMS | Water use | Gallons of water per 500 units manufactured |
All Environmental Management System (EMS) responsibilities should be assigned to a certain individual. Assign someone for:
To start, some businesses find it helpful to designate an EMS management representative, an EMS coordinator, and an EMS team with members from each process area, and then to define the responsibilities of these individuals. As the EMS progresses, responsibilities should be assigned for all EMS-related tasks as they are added. An employee must be competent enough to carry out their assigned responsibilities. An employee also must receive proper training to do EMS-related tasks. This doesn’t have to be a structured training class. A quick chat once a week between a manager and a front-line person on their EMS duties may be more effective than a formal EMS training class. Managers must ensure that any employee assigned an EMS task has enough authority and resources—including time—to carry out the task.
The dynamics of the business will determine who should be responsible for implementing the EMS. Key concepts concerning the assignment of responsibility include:
Keep the following points in mind while planning an Environmental Management System (EMS):
Who does the reviews and why?
A team of two or three managers or employees can conduct an internal assessment. They should not conduct the assessment of their own work area to prevent bias. The results should be organized into a clear format and presented to the owner or president of the company. Evaluating the EMS on a regular basis enables a company to determine what parts of the Environmental Management System (EMS) work well and what needs tweaks. Results should show progress toward goals.
How are EMS evaluations done?
The whole audit process revolves around planning, executing, and reporting. An audit of any kind is the comparison of actual conditions to expected conditions. It is a determination as to whether one is in conformance or not. As a company, conduct annual internal assessments and management briefings. Those doing the assessments should include employee interviews, observations, and documentation.
In the EMS report consider including the following helpful measures of progress: