Be Part of the Ultimate Safety & Compliance Community
Trending news, knowledge-building content, and more – all personalized to you!
Standard Number: 1910.106
February 13, 1986
MEMORANDUM FOR: |
LINDA ANKU REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR |
FROM: |
JOHN B. MILES, JR., DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF FIELD OPERATIONS |
SUBJECT: | Applicability of 1910.106 to Chemical Plants |
This is in response to your memo of December 23, 1985, same subject.
The art of determining sufficient pressure relief for the storage of unstable liquids is not simple nor even a direct engineering solution. As stated by API 2000 and 521, no one method of sizing the relief ports has gained widespread acceptance, therefore engineers must use their best solution and apply a liberal safety margin. It is generally recognized that only rupture discs can provide the reaction time and volume flow necessary to vent an unstable liquid. Suppression techniques applicable to the situation should also be evaluated.
The referenced Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code-1968, does not provide specific coverage of this issue, therefore only the 1910.106(b)(2)(v) requirement addresses unstable liquid storage pressure relief considerations. In this instance of ethylene oxide storage, it is thought that Union Carbide had an adequate design for pressure relief, as demonstrated at Bhopal, however the handling of the escaping toxic material through a neutralizer of adequate capacity is a primary concern and was an apparent shortcoming of the equipment at Bhopal. Suppression techniques appear to have been woefully deficient.
We recognize that this is a general response to your question. Should you require an analysis of a specific situation, further assistance can be arranged.