
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.
On May 20, OSHA updated its Site-Specific Targeting (SST) program to reflect the use of Form 300A data for calendar years (CY) 2021-2023. The SST program is OSHA’s primary planned inspection program for general industry establishments with 20 or more employees with the highest injury and illness rates.
Using Form 300A data from CY 2021-2023, OSHA may target establishments for inspection based on:
This update replaces the previous SST directive, issued in February 2023, which used CY 2019-2021 data.
When questioning whether or not employers need to pay employees extra for working nights or weekends, the short answer is no, unless a state law requires it. Employers may have agreements or contracts with employees that require such additional pay, however, to make these shifts more enticing.
Extra pay (sometimes referred to as “premium pay”) for working weekends or nights is a matter of agreement between employers and their employees (or the employees’ representative). The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets the base for employee pay, does not require extra pay for working the night shift or on weekends.
If the night or weekend hours cause an employee’s total hours for the week to top 40, however, it’s a different story. The FLSA does require covered employers to pay nonexempt workers not less than time and a half their regular rate for time worked over 40 hours in a workweek.
In addition to not requiring bonus pay for night or weekend work, the FLSA does not require employers to give employees paid time off, such as vacation, sick leave, or general paid time off (PTO). If an employee works while on PTO, the FLSA does not require employers to pay extra for that time.
Many states, however, have laws that entitle eligible employees to paid time off for a variety of qualifying reasons. Employers should pay close attention to the details of these leave laws, as they may restrict employees from working while on leave.
Concerning time off, some states have “day of rest” or similar laws requiring employers to give employees at least one day off in a seven-day workweek.
Certain states also require premium pay for weekend work, even if the total hours worked do not exceed 40 in a workweek. This premium pay, often at a rate higher than standard overtime, varies by state.
Under California law, for example, employers must pay overtime for any work beyond eight hours in one workday and any work beyond 40 hours in one workweek. They must also pay overtime for the first eight hours worked on the seventh day of work in any one workweek. Employers must pay double time for any work beyond 12 hours in one day and any work above eight hours on any seventh day of a work week.
Key to remember: Employers don’t have to pay employees extra for working weekends or night shifts under federal law, but state laws might require it.
Heat is the leading cause of death among all hazardous weather conditions in the United States, according to OSHA. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show nearly 480 workers died from exposure to environmental heat from 2011-2022, an average of 40 fatalities per year.
Although outdoor workers come to mind when we think about heat exposure, indoor workers also can be affected. Indoor work settings without adequate climate controls are at risk of hazardous heat, especially when heat-generating processes or equipment such as furnaces and hot ovens, are present.
Below are popular questions our experts receive related to heat.
A: The agency has scheduled a virtual public hearing for June 16 on its proposed Heat rule. Following the hearing, OSHA will analyze comments it received, which can take several months. Once this step is completed, OSHA will determine what’s next. This may include finalizing the rule.
A: “Indoor” is defined in the proposed rule as “an area under a ceiling or overhead covering that restricts airflow and has along its entire perimeter walls, doors, windows, dividers, or other physical barriers that restrict airflow, whether open or closed.” Examples include:
Construction activity is considered “indoors” when performed inside a structure after the outside walls and the roof are built.
A: Several states have their own heat-related regulations. Note that they vary in the type of industries covered, whether they apply to indoor and/or outdoor workplaces, and the expectations and requirements for employers. These states are:
Additionally, Arizona and OSHA Region IX have launched emphasis programs.
And finally, several states and territories adopted OSHA’s National Emphasis Program (NEP) for indoor and outdoor heat hazards (CPL 03-00-024). Some adopt it identically and others made changes. These include California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Virginia, the Virgin Islands, Vermont, and Washington.
A: Yes, OSHA can cite your warehouse for heat hazards. In fact, under the agency’s NEP (CPL 03-00-024), OSHA compliance officers must initiate inspections in any of the 70 listed, high-risk industries (including the warehousing and storage industry) in outdoor and indoor work settings when the National Weather Service issues a heat warning or advisory for a local area. Inspectors will review illness logs and other records, interview workers, determine if the employer has a heat illness prevention program, document ambient conditions, and identify work activities relevant to heat-related hazards.
If there’s sufficient evidence to issue a citation for heat-related hazards, a citation under the General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act will be issued.
A: Heat illness cases must be recorded if they meet OSHA’s recording criteria. To be recordable, the condition must involve medical treatment beyond first aid. First aid treatments listed in 29 CFR 1904.7 include “drinking fluids for relief of heat stress.” For instance, if an employee showed heat stress symptoms and needed a break to cool down and drink fluids, this alone is not a “recordable” case for the 300 Log. However, if the employee went to the hospital for intravenous (IV) fluid replacement, that would be recordable as medical treatment. Similarly, OSHA says if the employee went unconscious or oxygen was administered, the case is required to be recorded.
A case of heat stress will also become recordable if the employee needs restrictions or days away from work.
Key to remember: In the absence of a final Heat rule at the federal level, OSHA can use the General Duty Clause to cite for heat-related hazards. On June 16, the agency will hold a virtual public hearing on its proposed Heat rule. Meanwhile, some states already have heat regulations in place.
On May 21, 2025, the Western District Court of Louisiana vacated the “abortion accommodation mandate” in the federal Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) regulations. It also told the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) — the agency that wrote the final regulations — to revise the regulations and related guidance.
The PWFA requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodations to the known limitations related to an employee’s pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation imposes an undue hardship. A limitation is a “physical or mental condition related to, affected by, or arising out of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.”
The final regulations list examples of related medical conditions, and the examples include “termination of pregnancy, including via miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion.”
The court reasoned that, because the PWFA statute does not refer to abortion, elective abortion was not intended to fall within the PWFA’s definition of covered pregnancy-related “medical conditions.” If Congress had intended to mandate that employers accommodate elective abortions under the PWFA, it would have spoken clearly when enacting the statute, the court noted.
Therefore, it held that when the EEOC included elective abortions in the final regulations, it exceeded its statutory authority to implement the PWFA.
Because of the court ruling, employers covered by the PWFA will not need to provide reasonable accommodations to employees who elect to have abortions. The ruling applies nationwide but does not change any other part of the law or regulations. Employers must recognize accommodation requests under the PWFA and understand their obligations.
The State of Louisiana, et al, vs. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. District Court Western District of Louisiana, No. 2:24-cv-00629.
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, et al, vs Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al, U.S. District Court Western District of Louisiana, No. 2:24-cv-00691.
Key to remember: As a result of the court’s ruling, employers do not have to accommodate employee elective abortions that are not necessary to treat a medical condition related to pregnancy.
A series of proposed rule changes from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) could result in less work and cost for drivers and motor carriers alike.
The agency released a whopping 18 proposals in one day, taking aim at a broad range of requirements related to electronic logs, railroad crossings, violation reporting, vehicle parts, and more.
Though the proposed changes are relatively minor, they may represent the first salvo in the new administration’s deregulatory efforts.
The proposals were due to be published on May 30, 2025, and the FMCSA is accepting public comments on them until late July.
The following is a summary of how the proposed changes, if finalized, would ease burdens on commercial drivers and motor carriers:
ELD manuals: Drivers would no longer need to carry a user manual (either paper or electronic) for their electronic logging device (ELD). This violation alone was cited over 3,660 times last year. Other ELD-related documents would still be required, however, such as malfunction and transfer instructions and blank logs.
Railroad crossings: Bus drivers and those hauling certain hazardous materials would no longer need to stop before crossing a railroad track equipped with an active warning device (i.e., lights or gates), as long as the device is not activated.
Accident recording/reporting: Motor carriers would no longer need to record information about accidents where the only medical treatment that occurred involved imaging (such as x-rays or CT scans) or a prescription but no treatment for diagnosed injuries or other medical interventions directly related to the accident.
Inspections
CDLs
Parts and accessories
The FMCSA issued a few other final or proposed changes that will have limited impact:
Though you can’t take advantage of the changes until they’re finalized (probably later this year), you can help sway whether the changes actually take place. You can go online to submit comments about any of the FMCSA’s active proposals, at www.regulations.gov. Just look for the latest dockets from the FMCSA.
Key to remember: The FMCSA has issued a wide variety of proposed rule changes that could save time and money for both motor carriers and drivers.
Many common areas of confusion regarding forklift operation do not appear in the OSHA regulations. Perhaps the lack of regulatory information adds to the confusion. Below are the answers to some frequently asked questions.
Since forklifts are not operated on public roads, the operator does not need a driver’s license. In fact, OSHA requires training on the differences between a forklift and a car. Someone with a driver's license might assume that forklifts handle like cars, but they do not!
A forklift operator must, however, be at least 18 years old. That’s not in the OSHA regulations, but appears in the child labor regulations. Minors under 18 years of age cannot operate (or even ride on) equipment like forklifts or scissor lifts.
Everyone knows that forklift operators must use the seatbelt if the forklift has one. That does not appear in the OSHA standard, but it’s usually a safety warning in the forklift operator manual. Since failing to wear a seat belt is a recognized hazard that could cause serious injury, OSHA uses the General Duty Clause to cite employers that don’t enforce seatbelt use.
Employers occasionally hire trainees with hearing loss, vision impairment, or other physical limitations. Alternatively, an experienced forklift operator could get injured or experience similar impairments. OSHA does not establish specific requirements for vision, hearing, or other qualifications, and physical limitations are not necessarily disqualifying.
Instead, employers must evaluate the individual and determine if the person can operate safely. Trainers should work with their Human Resources team to evaluate possible accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Do not assume that a physical limitation would prevent someone from becoming a safe forklift operator. If an evaluation finds that the person cannot meet acceptable safety standards, the employer may refuse to certify the operator.
The employer determines who is qualified to deliver powered industrial truck training. The trainer must have the “knowledge, training, and experience” to train and evaluate operators. Attending a “train the trainer” class and getting a certification isn’t a bad idea, but OSHA doesn’t require any particular course or certification to be a trainer.
OSHA does, however, require that the trainer have experience using the type of equipment that trainees will operate. Since experience is required, the trainer likely received training on using that equipment. Further, if the employer purchases a new type of truck or attachment that the trainer has never used, the trainer will need experience using that equipment before training others.
For related information, see our articles on Debunking the mysteries of forklift training (Part 1) and Debunking the mysteries of forklift training (Part 2).
Modifications that affect “safe operation” require the manufacturer’s written approval per 1910.178(a)(4). In OSHA’s view, that covers nearly any change, even adding a warning light or backup alarm. A Letter of Interpretation dated April 11, 1997, clarified that if the manufacturer does not respond or refuses to approve a modification, employers may instead get approval from a Qualified Registered Professional Engineer. Employers should ensure that forklift operators don’t modify equipment, like adding plywood or tarps to the cage as a sun shade. Those changes could affect safe operation and would require approval.
Key to remember: The powered industrial truck standard does not address every issue that employers might face, but employers can find answers in other regulations or guidance.
Did You Know You Can Ask Unlimited Questions to Our Compliance Experts?
Get answers to your most puzzling compliance questions from the industry’s top experts!